Belief Change as Propositional Update

نویسندگان

  • Renée Elio
  • Francis Jeffry Pelletier
چکیده

This study examines the problem of belief revision, defined as deciding which of several initially accepted sentences to disbelieve, when new information presents a logical inconsistency with the initial set. In the first three experiments , the initial sentence set included a conditional sentence, a non-conditional (ground) sentence, and an inferred conclusion drawn from the first two. The new information contradicted the inferred conclusion. Results indicated that conditional sentences were more readily abandoned than ground sentences , even when either choice would lead to a consistent belief state, and that this preference was more pronounced when problems used natural language cover stories rather than symbols. The pattern of belief revision choices differed depending on whether the contradicted conclusion from the initial belief set had been a modus ponens or modus tollens inference. Two additional experiments examined alternative model-theoretic definitions of minimal change to a belief state, using problems that contained multiple models of the initial belief state and of the new information that provided the contradiction. The results indicated that people did not follow any of four formal definitions of minimal change on these problems. The new information and the contradiction it offered was not, for example, used to select a particular model of the initial belief state as a way of reconciling the contradiction. The preferred revision was to retain only those initial sentences that had the same, unambiguous truth value within and across both the initial and new information sets. The study and results are presented in the context of certain logic-based formalizations of belief revision, syntactic and model-theoretic representations of belief states, and performance models of human deduction. Principles by which some types of sentences might be more " entrenched " than others in the face of contradiction are also discussed from the perspective of induction and theory revision.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Propositional Dynamic Logic as a Logic of Knowledge Update and Belief Revision

This talk shows how propositional dynamic logic (PDL) can be interpreted as a logic for multi-agent knowledge update and belief revision, or as a logic of preference change, if the basic relations are read as preferences instead of plausibilities. Our point of departure is the logic of communication and change (LCC) of [9]. Like LCC, our logic uses PDL as a base epistemic language. Unlike LCC, ...

متن کامل

La mise-à-jour des croyances pour des fragments de la logique propositionnelle

Recently, belief change within the framework of fragments of propositional logic has gained attention. Previous works focused on belief contraction and belief revision mainly on the Horn fragment. However, the problem of belief update within the framework of fragments of propositional logic has been neglected so far. This paper presents a general approach to define new update operators derived ...

متن کامل

Belief Change Operations: A Short History of Nearly Everything, Told in Dynamic Logic of Propositional Assignments

We examine several belief change operations in the light of Dynamic Logic of Propositional Assignments DL-PA. We show that we can encode in a systematic way update operations (such as Winslett’s ‘Possible Models Approach’) and revision operations (such as Dalal’s) as particular DL-PA programs. Every DL-PA formula being equivalent to a boolean formula, we obtain syntactical counterparts for all ...

متن کامل

Propositional Dynamic Logic as a Logic of Belief Revision

This paper shows how propositional dynamic logic (PDL) can be interpreted as a logic for multi-agent belief revision. For that we revise and extend the logic of communication and change (LCC) of [9]. Like LCC, our logic uses PDL as a base epistemic language. Unlike LCC, we start out from agent plausibilities, add their converses, and build knowledge and belief operators from these with the PDL ...

متن کامل

Prime Implicants and Belief Update

Adaptation is one of the most important capabilities that an intelligent agent should present. In order to provide this capability to logical-based agents, the Belief Change area proposes methods to incorporate new information in a belief set. Properties like consistency and minimal change guide the change process. The notion of minimal change is usually associated with a closeness criterion ba...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Cognitive Science

دوره 21  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1997